John Bercow: Order. We must move on.

John Bercow: Order. The Minister was diverted from the path of virtue by the hon. Member for Beckenham (Bob Stewart). No doubt the intentions were good, but we were straying somewhat from the terms of the UQ. As the Minister and others know, I have facilitated much discussion on the matter of refugees. I rather imagine that there will be more, and no doubt people will think, “And so there should be”, but it would be best today if we could stick to the terms of the UQ that the hon. Member for Batley and Spen (Jo Cox) applied for and that I granted.

John Bercow: I just note in passing that four Members on the Opposition Benches are standing and none of them hails from the area covered by the trust. That does not preclude a question, but I should just make the point that the question must be about this trust and this set of circumstances, rather than, as is commonly deployed  in this House, “and elsewhere”. It is just about this matter, in this situation, covered by this trust—a matter that will be approached with great dexterity, I am sure, by Ann Clwyd.

Julian Lewis: In 2011 and 2012, I was locked in a bitter confrontation with Southern Health Foundation Trust over the determination of its top management to close no fewer than 58 out of its 165 acute in-patient beds for people suffering from mental health illnesses and breakdowns. It is the only constituency issue over which I have ever suffered sleepless nights, and I failed to stop the trust closing the Windsor ward in the relatively new Woodhaven hospital in my constituency. Today, apart from this terrible issue about the deaths, the system remains overfull, the beds remain too few and I understand that at least 80% of the in-patients are people who have been sectioned, leaving people a very low chance of getting an elective bed from Southern Health unless they are prepared to wait a long time. Can the CQC look into this wider issue, given that it has so many other serious concerns about the trust?

Brandon Lewis: Let me make a bit more progress; I shall give way again later.
There is much on which we can agree with the other place here today, but let me be clear that, as we have just touched on, there are some areas where we cannot. We are determined to deliver for Britain on our election promises. The manifesto on which this Government were elected set out a very clear statement of intent about a viable extension of the right to buy, paid for by the sale of higher-value housing, and about 200,000 starter homes by the end of this Parliament.

Lindsay Hoyle: I must remind the House that the motion relates exclusively to England. A double majority is therefore required.
The House divided:
Ayes 287279, Noes 172158.

Lindsay Hoyle: I remind the House that the motion relates exclusively to England. A double majority is therefore required.
The House divided:
Ayes 288279, Noes 172158.

Motion made, and Question put, That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 54.—(Brandon Lewis.)
The House divided:
Ayes 286278, Noes 171157.

John Bercow: I must remind the House that the motion relates exclusively to England. A double majority is therefore required.
The House divided:
Ayes 286277, Noes 163149.

John Bercow: I must remind the House that the motion relates exclusively to England and Wales. A double majority is therefore required.
The House divided:
Ayes 285285, Noes 164161.